I have met and heard the tragic stories of many parents. PA is a function, by and large, of a custodial ex-partner, although some alienation can start while the couple is still together.

This blog is a story of experiences and observations of dysfunctional Family Law (FLAW), an arena pitting parent against parent, with children as the prize. Due to the gender bias in Family Law, that I have observed, this Blog has evolved from a focus solely on PA to one of the broader Family/Children's Rights area and the impact of Feminist mythology on Canadian Jurisprudence and the Divorce Industry.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra discusses his Parent's Rights Constitutional Amendment with Bill O'Reilly on the Factor, 4-14-09.

Parents Rights U.S.A.

http://www.parentsrights.us/

Parents have the responsibility, and should have the freedom, to care for, love and nurture their children. In America, parents and not the government should determine how their children are raised and how they should be educated.

At a time when government at every level seems to encroach upon the ability of parents to choose the best for their children, it is important to preserve parents' rights in our Constitution.

Of course, there is a role for government to play in protecting children against abuse and neglect, and the Parents' Rights Constitutional Amendment explicitly preserves that right. However, establishing parents' rights as fundamental would protect parents’ ability to raise their children against attack from government bureaucracy and international law.

Now is the time to empower parents and not policymakers. Help preserve parents' rights both now and for future generations!

Published: 4/15/2009

No comments: