I have met and heard the tragic stories of many parents. PA is a function, by and large, of a custodial ex-partner, although some alienation can start while the couple is still together.

This blog is a story of experiences and observations of dysfunctional Family Law (FLAW), an arena pitting parent against parent, with children as the prize. Due to the gender bias in Family Law, that I have observed, this Blog has evolved from a focus solely on PA to one of the broader Family/Children's Rights area and the impact of Feminist mythology on Canadian Jurisprudence and the Divorce Industry.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

In the UK ~ Conservative Conference: Tories Favor Shared Parenting After Breakup

Will the UK Tories pull ahead of the Canadian Tories in the quest for greater sanity in the currently maniacal adversarial divorce process in Canada. It would not surprise me as Nicholson, the Federal Tory Justice Minister, appears to lose his gonads when confronted with the possibility of having to face the feminists over their disapproval of shared/equal parenting as proposed in PMB C-422. One only has to look at his response to the shrieking of a feminist lawyer at the Canadian Bar Association meeting in Ireland not long ago. Nicholson, unfortunately is not the only politician turned eunuch, at the hands of a small but vocal minority of gender feminist whiners afraid of losing entitlements and their privileges.MJM By Janaki Mahadevan Children & Young People Now 8 October 2009

Couples who break up should by default have shared parenting responsibility, according to the shadow children's minister.

Speaking at a fringe meeting hosted by charity consortium Kids in the Middle, Tim Loughton said his party preferred a system which presumed shared parenting following family break down.

He also suggested that couples who cannot agree on joint arrangements should be made to go through a mediation process.

He said: "At the moment we have got an incredibly adversarial system when parents split up. It is crazy we have so many acrimonious cases.

"From the start of the process there should be a default mechanism for shared responsibility unless there is a welfare reason not to."

His comments answered concerns set out by the 26 charities that make up Kids in the Middle, over the adverse impact of conflict between parents on children.

Duncan Fisher, chief executive of the Fatherhood institute who is managing the campaign, said he wanted to see a more committed approach to relationship education in schools. He added that both parents needed to be engaged through health visitors and the midwifery process.

Answering a question from Shireen Ritchie, the chair of the Local Government Authority's children and young people board, about how local authorities can logistically involve both parents, Fisher said the process should start before the child is born.

"There are difficulties with working with two parents rather than one. But 95 per cent of couples are together during pregnancy. If we get them then, get their names, addresses get them registered then you are not chasing after them once the baby is born."

http://www.cypnow.co.uk/news/ByDiscipline/Childcare-and-Early-Years/login/944304/

No comments: