I have met and heard the tragic stories of many parents. PA is a function, by and large, of a custodial ex-partner, although some alienation can start while the couple is still together.

This blog is a story of experiences and observations of dysfunctional Family Law (FLAW), an arena pitting parent against parent, with children as the prize. Due to the gender bias in Family Law, that I have observed, this Blog has evolved from a focus solely on PA to one of the broader Family/Children's Rights area and the impact of Feminist mythology on Canadian Jurisprudence and the Divorce Industry.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

A memorial for 29 men lost ~ There were no feminists on board this ship

Why moms get jealous when dads bond with kids

Read the following and then put it in the context of your own situation. Many of us clearly know our ex's are control freaks but this puts a more rational aspect to it and how some women overcome the jealousy and control. Mine clearly has no ability to do so. I can relate to the guilt of being away. I was away from my 3rd child for only one weekend when she was a toddler but I had to call her every day to say hello and had her picture with me on my night stand. In the ten years I was raising the two youngest of my 4 daughters that was one of the very few times I was away when I didn't have at least one of them with me. I can relate to the woman who wants the Sponge Bob voice. I have Mr. Bill and I still enjoy watching Sponge Bob. Men can and do nurture. I am living proof. (MJM)

Why moms get jealous when dads bond with kids

  • Story Highlights
  • There is still a perception that moms should be better parents than dads
  • A mom doesn't like to feel that a child loves Dad more
  • Advice: Appreciate having another pair of hands to help with parenting
By Melissa Balmain

"Now stay in bed and go to sleep," my husband, Bill, said as he hugged our 3-year-old son, Davey, good night. "If you don't, I'm gonna talk in my troll voice all day tomorrow."

As dads spend more time with their kids, mothers sometimes feel they have to defend their territory.

As dads spend more time with their kids, mothers sometimes feel they have to defend their territory.

I smiled with pity at this poor, deluded man. Several times a night, Davey had been getting up to look at books. I had spent fruitless hours reasoning with him. No way could Bill's threat make a difference, especially since Davey found his troll-under-the-bridge act more funny than scary.

But that night, Davey didn't get up once. In the morning he ran around crowing that he'd won and the troll couldn't come. Bill, unlike me, must have known that Davey needed to turn staying in bed into a game. Of course I was grateful.

I was also just the tiniest bit jealous. Why hadn't I been the one with the great insight? Why couldn't I talk like a troll?

It's comforting to know that I'm not the only mom who's had such moments. Plenty of us admit to everything from mild envy to full-blown resentment of our mates' parenting skills. And that makes us feel ungrateful: After all, we finally have something that mothers have wanted for generations: an extra pair of hands.

Today's dads spend 21.7 hours a week on child care and related duties such as shopping and housework, up nine hours from 30 years ago, according to research by the University of Maryland. Which isn't to say that moms still don't handle the vast majority of kid-linked tasks -- a whopping 39 hours weekly.

Still, our guys are doing more than their dads did. Fathers clip tiny toenails and baby-food coupons. They read bedtime stories and clothing labels. And while some of our own dads had no clue about how to change a diaper, our kids' dads often have fierce opinions on Luvs versus Huggies. Parenting.com: Secrets to a made-to-last marriage

We moms say we want our spouses to be do-it-all dads: We're forward-thinking women of the 21st century. Besides, if they did less, we couldn't possibly juggle our busy lives without going nuts.

"But we don't want them to take over," says Pyper Davis, a mother of two in Washington, D.C. "We don't ever want to be pushed off that throne of being Mommy."

Jealousy and envy and ego, oh my!

One reason we're possessive of the parental crown may be that, although society's changed, we still get traditional messages about women's roles. "A lot of our mothers, our workplaces, our TV shows still tell us that moms should do most of the childcare," says Liz Park, Ph.D., a marriage and family therapist with three kids in Crownsville, Maryland. We moms can be good at taking such messages to heart. Parenting.com: Keeping score in the chore wars

"For women, no matter how far along you are in your career or no matter how much of a feminist you consider yourself to be, at some level you're coming from an assumption that women are caretakers," says Heather Gerken of New Haven, Connecticut, a law professor and the mother of Anna, 6, and Ben, 2. "When Anna was a baby, I would feel guilty about the time away from her," she says.

And at home, sharing child care with her husband, she felt a little jealous that he was as central to Anna's life as she was. "Now that I've gone through this twice, all I'd add is that the twinges of regret are overwhelmed by the joy of raising kids together. There's no other reason I can think of for that jealousy, except for the guilty, nagging feeling that you ought to be spending more time with your child."

Well, there are at least a few other reasons.

The briefness of those precious early years, for one. "When our son was a baby, Brian gave him more of his baths," says Jessica Davis of Chicago. (Both names were changed.) She believed it was important for them to have such one-on-one moments, but "I remember thinking a few times, 'I should take the bath with him!' Especially when they're babies, you're likely to think, 'I want this piece or that piece' because babies sleep so much and quality time with them is much more limited than with an older child." Parenting.com's guide to kid sleep

Then there's the matter of love. Naturally, when our spouses spend extra time nurturing our children, the kids become extra attached. "David* just adores his dad. He's his little shadow," Amy Conner* of Nashua, New Hampshire, says of her 3-year-old son. She understands the daddy worship; she thinks her husband, is "more playful" with David than she is. "But at first it just hurt because I didn't feel that he loved me as much as [him]," she admits.

For some moms, like me, what hurts is a deep-seated notion that we should be better parents than our spouses -- more instinctive, more inventive, more in tune with our kids' needs. D'Anne Gleicher of Alameda, California, finds herself battling this idea when her daughter is sick. Because she can't get paid time off from her job as an attorney, her husband is usually the one to stay home with Ava, 8. "I know he's very capable of caring for her, but I want to believe I'm better at it than he is -- even though I'm not. I think it's the whole 'I'm the mommy and I can fix anything.' It's almost like a savior thing."

Working mothers aren't the only ones who long to be saviors. Sarah Mock of Tualatin, Oregon, quit working as a high school teacher when her second daughter was born. "When you've made this decision to stay home, you've given up this side of you where you can shine as your own person. Instead, you feel pressure to shine as a parent," she explains. Which can make it frustrating when your husband is as much fun with the kids as you are. "Recently John helped them make their own version of Candy Land. I thought, 'Why can't I think of things that are more creative?' " she says. "It seems he's doing very well at work and then when he comes home he's doing very well with the kids, so it's like he's doing great everywhere and I'm running to keep up."

Who's the boss?

If we're not careful, jealousy and insecurity can turn moms into control freaks. So says Park, a recovering control freak herself. "With our first child, I was constantly asking my husband, 'Are you making sure he's getting his vegetables?' It feels good to make the decisions."

Trouble is, "the more we control how dads do things, the less involved they want to be," Park says. A recent Ohio State University study of almost 100 couples with newborns backs her up: Researchers found that even dads who believed they should be highly involved in childcare shied away from doing things for their infant if Mom was very judgmental. Parenting.com: The truth about bonding

So Park recommends trying what she did with her husband and her son, Joe, now 11. "I had to let go and let them have their own relationship -- he's a competent man! If Joe doesn't have a vegetable, who cares?" When you find yourself hovering, Park suggests, leave the room. And if you feel compelled to share some crucial knowledge -- the latest food pyramid for toddlers, say -- try offering him some childcare lit. "That way it's neutral. It's not like you're dictating to him how to do it," she says.

Rethinking the rivalry

As for curbing the green-eyed monster, it comes down to discovering things you do well with your kids. When they're babies, simply breastfeeding them is something Dad can't do, and may be enough. Later on, try sharing your passions, from gardening to karate. It's also smart to take turns doing the fun stuff, like playing with the kids, as well as the non-fun stuff (say, disciplining them). Dad's giving the baths? Great. Make storytime yours, instead of moping. Parenting.com: Play list

Most important, moms say, remember how lucky your kids are to have two hands-on parents. Gleicher hopes that having a caring, involved father will one day spur her daughter to choose a guy with those qualities. "She won't end up with somebody she doesn't respect," she says.

Speaking of respect, adds Gerken, it's the best cure she's found yet for parental jealousy. "Just to glory in your husband's abilities as a dad, I think, is key," she says.

Next time Bill pulls off a child-care coup, I plan to be a model of admiration. I'll watch and learn. And I won't begrudge him his troll voice one bit -- as long as talking like SpongeBob can be mine, all mine.

Domestic violence victims may get defence for murder in Australia

If you are a man you may become part of "open season" for hunting in OZ based on new legislation being contemplated. It is supposed to be gender neutral but those of us who have been victims of battering by ex wives clearly know it is targeted at men. Have your say by clicking here.

Article from: The Courier-Mail Australia

Patrick Lion

October 14, 2008 12:00am

VICTIMS of domestic violence who kill their abuser will be able to claim a defence against murder or manslaughter charges under new laws.

The so-called "battered person" defence for homicide trials is scheduled to be introduced next year, after the Bligh Government approved changes to the Criminal Code. The proposal comes after a recent Queensland Law Reform Commission report on the defence of accident and provocation recommended the creation of a separate defence for seriously abusive relationships.
Should battery be a murder defence? Have your say.
The move received mixed support from interest groups, but Attorney-General Kerry Shine described the overhaul as groundbreaking. It would also apply to family violence involving adults, children and both genders. "This is an important change that allows juries to specifically consider the impact that domestic violence or serious abuse in a relationship may have upon a person," Mr Shine said. The law is expected to be introduced in the first half of next year while the Government considered its response to other recommendations. The QLRC report recommended no changes to the excuse of accident but called for several changes to the partial defence of provocation. Queensland Homicide Victims Support Group chief executive Jonty Bush reserved judgment on the domestic violence proposal, saying the move was a contentious issue. "On the one hand, people ask is there ever a reason to take another's life?" Ms Bush said. "On the other, when people are regularly beaten and subjected to life-threatening and humiliating experiences, they may not see any other option." Queensland Bar Association honorary secretary Roger Traves, SC, supported the reform, saying the current law was too narrow because the terms dealt only with acts in the heat of passion caused by sudden provocation. "The defence of provocation in NSW is broader than that in Queensland and we would welcome reform of these laws," he said. Opposition justice spokesman Mike Horan said he wanted to see the detail but was concerned about murder defences based on past behaviour. "Murder is murder and we have to be very careful. It may lull people into thinking they have the right to shoot or murder someone for things that have happened in the past," he said

VICTIMS of domestic violence who kill their abuser will be able to claim a defence against murder or manslaughter charges under new laws.

The so-called "battered person" defence for homicide trials is scheduled to be introduced next year, after the Bligh Government approved changes to the Criminal Code. The proposal comes after a recent Queensland Law Reform Commission report on the defence of accident and provocation recommended the creation of a separate defence for seriously abusive relationships.
Should battery be a murder defence? Have your say.
The move received mixed support from interest groups, but Attorney-General Kerry Shine described the overhaul as groundbreaking.

(Ed note: The following are a sample of comments received to date on the Oz site including mine and one other from Canada. MJM)

Luke Geurtsen said..... "You can call me sexist, but this defence should only be available to women. I know women can be physically abusive too, but men tend to defend themsleves or leave the relationship. Just look at the number of women vs men who die from an abusive spouse."

I will call you sexist and chauvinist to boot. Males are at least a quarter of deaths(and growing) and a third of serious injuries in domestic situations. You would deny abused men justice but can you imagine the outrage at women being denied anything at all because there are fewer of them.


Jeff Dunne said... "Bout bloody time, maybe now these so called "Men" might think before they act. Any man who abuses a woman deserves to have his ass kicked. It must take a lot of strength and balls to pick on a woman. Good to see that the law is finally on their side when they fight back. Andrew Z, i think getting your teeth knocked out is a lot worse than getting emotionally upset. Only weak men feel its alright to beat a lady, you wanna hit something try someone who can hit back!!"...

The typical conditioning for males is to be ├╝ber protective of females. You've demonstrated this very well yourself. The male who abuses a woman is experiencing a serious break from conditioning he has undergone from a very early age. You, Jeff, are the patriarchy. Absurdly protective of women. Willing to do anything to any male should he even look askance at one of your "harem". YOU are what womens' lib originally set out to defeat before subsequently feminists found it much more productive to collude with the patriarchs instead...

Be careful what you wish for Jeff. You like to cast yourself as a knight in shining armour but you are only a simple, unproven allegation away from having the dung kicked out of you by other like minded, chivalrous, patriarchal men.


shi said... Batman, please for the love of god learn to read and punctuate. FTA: "the amendment would ensure the defence was available to men, women and children"...

It will be worded in gender neutral language. I do not expect the application will be gender neutral in the slightest. Our sexual assault laws were "gender neutralised" a decade ago but we still refuse to punish women who rape boys. The over protection of women has become so strong in the feminist patriarchy that we can't even criticise women let alone punish them for their wrongdoing.

Posted by: Greg Allan of Bendigo 3:11pm October 19, 2008 Comment 54 of 54

If this law is passed it would appear, if I lived in Australia, that I would be justified in killing my wife for the 14 years I was battered.

Hmmm...when will Canada become so enlightened as to allow such a mechanism to be enacted to free all members and all genders from their batterers.

On reflection does this appear to be a good law? Will Australia apply it equally to men and women. Make certain you know what you are precipitating because in most families in English speaking countries the woman initiates violence at least as often as the man - but there is more - as battering can be emotional - my ex among many other acts of egregious misjudgment committed theft fraud and forgery against my former employer, ruining my career and my reputation. That was only the beginning. I have been attacked emotionally, financially and physically. over the 14 years. Does that give me the right to kill her?

I think not. Murder is murder. Its a bad move. Fight it or it will be open season on men worse than it is now.

Posted by: Mike Murphy of Sault Ste. Marie, ON 3:24am October 19, 2008 Comment 52 of 54

The utter stupidity of passing laws that, in essence, state that it is excusable carry out homicide rather than a phone call to the police makes government's extension of entitlement without responsibility infinitely absurd.

It's so sad to see the politics of fascism appropriated with this passive aggressive assault on justice and sensibility.

Posted by: DNH 12:42am October 19, 2008 Comment 51 of 54

This is feminist jurisprudence run amok!

Posted by: Laura Hoagland 12:41am October 19, 2008 Comment 50 of 54

Premeditated murder will soon be legal in Australia ? What else is it when a partner plots and plans for years or even maybe a few days can get away withh this crime. Bravo Australia - who says there is no bottom to stupidity. Just remember, for every 6 battered women there are 5 battered men. Sooooo....whatcha gonna do when those victims with penises start using that defense? But this is what happens when hysterics take control. We men have no one to blame but ourselves for not being more vocal in court. Shame on all. William Levy Ethics Committee Status of Men Canada

Posted by: william levy of Canada- Status of men Canada 12:09am October 19, 2008 Comment 49 of 54